Talk:Spider Tank: Difference between revisions

From Destinypedia, the Destiny wiki

No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


You know, concept arts don't necessarily end up in the final product of the game. They are there to show the "true vision" of the game. I suggest stopping creating articles based on concept arts unless Bungie confirms that it appears in the actual game. Also, IGN is not Bungie, so to use something from IGN as a source is just wrong. <b>[[Userprofile:Hacame|<span style="color:#483C32; font-family:Comic Sans MS; font-size:14px;">Hacame</span>]]</b> 23:54, 23 February 2013 (EST)
You know, concept arts don't necessarily end up in the final product of the game. They are there to show the "true vision" of the game. I suggest stopping creating articles based on concept arts unless Bungie confirms that it appears in the actual game. Also, IGN is not Bungie, so to use something from IGN as a source is just wrong. <b>[[Userprofile:Hacame|<span style="color:#483C32; font-family:Comic Sans MS; font-size:14px;">Hacame</span>]]</b> 23:54, 23 February 2013 (EST)
:About that sourcing the name from IGN's "Concept Art Analysis", it appears "Spider Tank" is the working title for the vehicle, whether or not it will be in the game. IGN is not Bungie, this is true. But IGN appears to be the main source of ''Destiny'' information out there, looking at the amount of information Bungie has released. Though by that logic, ''all'' citations from sources outside Bungie should be removed, which isn't plausible. Anyway, this is the reason I added the "References" template, as much information in the article is either uncited or is cited from an unreliable source. Should I add the "[[Template:Conjectural title|Conjectural title]]" template, or perhaps transfer the "[[halopedia:Template:Tentative|Tentative]]" template? --<b>[[User:TentacleTornado|<font color="#2E8B57">''Tent''</font><font color="#3CB371">''acle''</font>]][[User talk:TentacleTornado|<font color="#DAA520">''Torn''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/TentacleTornado|<font color="#B8860B">''ado''</font>]]</b> 07:44, 24 February 2013 (EST)

Revision as of 08:44, February 24, 2013

What's this stuff about the assault on the hellmouth? Always use the DMR. This is craZboy557, signing off. 11:53, 23 February 2013 (EST)

I have no idea. I've added the "citation needed" template, it may be the same situation as on Pike. I'll ask, and have a look around. --TentacleTornado 12:00, 23 February 2013 (EST)

You know, concept arts don't necessarily end up in the final product of the game. They are there to show the "true vision" of the game. I suggest stopping creating articles based on concept arts unless Bungie confirms that it appears in the actual game. Also, IGN is not Bungie, so to use something from IGN as a source is just wrong. Hacame 23:54, 23 February 2013 (EST)

About that sourcing the name from IGN's "Concept Art Analysis", it appears "Spider Tank" is the working title for the vehicle, whether or not it will be in the game. IGN is not Bungie, this is true. But IGN appears to be the main source of Destiny information out there, looking at the amount of information Bungie has released. Though by that logic, all citations from sources outside Bungie should be removed, which isn't plausible. Anyway, this is the reason I added the "References" template, as much information in the article is either uncited or is cited from an unreliable source. Should I add the "Conjectural title" template, or perhaps transfer the "Tentative" template? --TentacleTornado 07:44, 24 February 2013 (EST)