Template talk:New content: Difference between revisions
From Destinypedia, the Destiny wiki
m (→Redundancy?) |
m (→Redundancy?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Makes sense; it can be removed from most pages. But it should still be used for things that we know even less than normal about, such as [[Strike]] and [[Comet]]. --[[User:Porplemontage|Porplemontage]] ([[User talk:Porplemontage|talk]]) 19:52, 11 November 2013 (EST) | :Makes sense; it can be removed from most pages. But it should still be used for things that we know even less than normal about, such as [[Strike]] and [[Comet]]. --[[User:Porplemontage|Porplemontage]] ([[User talk:Porplemontage|talk]]) 19:52, 11 November 2013 (EST) | ||
::Right, sounds good (give or take 9 days).--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} | ::Right, sounds good (give or take 9 days).--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 01:18, 21 November 2013 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:18, November 21, 2013
Redundancy?[edit]
I can't help but think that using this template at the moment is a bit redundant and pointless. As it stands, everything about Destiny is new and has new content that will inevitably come with the beta and the game's release. If the template was to be used to its fullest extent, nearly every article on the site will have the template, making the template rather useless. Any thoughts?--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 16:27, 11 November 2013 (EST)
- Makes sense; it can be removed from most pages. But it should still be used for things that we know even less than normal about, such as Strike and Comet. --Porplemontage (talk) 19:52, 11 November 2013 (EST)