Editing User talk:Shazamikaze
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Are you an admin? I noticed you protected [[The Taken King]] a few days ago, and that's usually a power only available to admins. I can't tell if you are one or not because there's no indication of it on your user page or profile. The reason I bring this up is that for a year now, the unregistered user [[Special:Contributions/66.188.180.235|66.188.180.235]] has been trolling the wiki by adding patently false info to articles and removing actual facts. His edits are always reverted, but that doesn't stop him from coming back a few days or weeks later and making them again. On behalf of everyone who's had to clean up this user's mess, I wanted to ask if you would ban him for a while, at minimum six months but preferably for a year, since that's how long he's been troubling us, and because he's no stranger to going inactive on his own for extended periods anyway and so might not notice or care about a shorter ban. Thanks for hearing me out, and feel free to ignore this if you actually don't have the ability to ban users. [[User:MorningWalker|MorningWalker]] ([[User talk:MorningWalker|talk]]) 15:23, 21 August 2015 (EDT) | Are you an admin? I noticed you protected [[The Taken King]] a few days ago, and that's usually a power only available to admins. I can't tell if you are one or not because there's no indication of it on your user page or profile. The reason I bring this up is that for a year now, the unregistered user [[Special:Contributions/66.188.180.235|66.188.180.235]] has been trolling the wiki by adding patently false info to articles and removing actual facts. His edits are always reverted, but that doesn't stop him from coming back a few days or weeks later and making them again. On behalf of everyone who's had to clean up this user's mess, I wanted to ask if you would ban him for a while, at minimum six months but preferably for a year, since that's how long he's been troubling us, and because he's no stranger to going inactive on his own for extended periods anyway and so might not notice or care about a shorter ban. Thanks for hearing me out, and feel free to ignore this if you actually don't have the ability to ban users. [[User:MorningWalker|MorningWalker]] ([[User talk:MorningWalker|talk]]) 15:23, 21 August 2015 (EDT) | ||