2,096
edits
Talk:Conduit F3: Difference between revisions
→More Content Needed
Shazamikaze (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::On that note, where is the Conduit actually mentioned? Did a word search, nothing comes up. They use an image of a Conduit as an example of a fusion rifle (which has the info from the update in its article), but as far as I can tell, none of that info seems to pertain to the Conduit specifically.--[[User:Hawki|Hawki]] ([[User talk:Hawki|talk]]) 19:38, 19 May 2014 (EDT) | ::On that note, where is the Conduit actually mentioned? Did a word search, nothing comes up. They use an image of a Conduit as an example of a fusion rifle (which has the info from the update in its article), but as far as I can tell, none of that info seems to pertain to the Conduit specifically.--[[User:Hawki|Hawki]] ([[User talk:Hawki|talk]]) 19:38, 19 May 2014 (EDT) | ||
:::Does it matter? The Conduit F3 is a fusion rifle. What is the difference? --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]) 23:43, 19 May 2014 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | :::Does it matter? The Conduit F3 is a fusion rifle. What is the difference? --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]) 23:43, 19 May 2014 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | ||
::::To prevent needless repetition of info? To prevent blanket statements being automatically applied? It's not the only fusion rifle in the game after all. By the same logic, every time x (info) is stated about y (whatever weapon), the same info would have to be given to every version of y that exists. And that's a ''lot'' of weapons. Not to mention that it's making an assumption that there's no exception to blanket statements within the weapon type itself.--[[User:Hawki|Hawki]] ([[User talk:Hawki|talk]]) 02:02, 20 May 2014 (EDT) | |||