Entelechy: Difference between revisions

12 bytes added ,  2 months ago
m
Line 191: Line 191:


[HNW047622]
[HNW047622]
We have all studied our histories. We know what we are capable of. What we have done. What if the [Nihilists/Redolent/Accepting] are right, and our final shape is our own destruction?
We have all studied our histories. We know what we are capable of. What we have done. What if the [Nihilists/[[Redolent]]/Accepting] are right, and our final shape is our own destruction?


[RS6243199]
[RS6243199]
Line 207: Line 207:


[HNW047622]
[HNW047622]
And why does it allow its gifts to be misused? It did not correct the [Profusion/Bountiful/Swarm] on their path to their great, fatal error. It did not stop the [Conquerors/Primacy/Sovereign] from using the gifts it granted for subjugation. Are we to accept that these, too, were meant to happen? If you reject the notion that destruction can be a final shape, how are we to accept that the Gardener allowed us to make such grievous mistakes?
And why does it allow its gifts to be misused? It did not correct the [Profusion/[[Bountiful]]/Swarm] on their path to their great, fatal error. It did not stop the [Conquerors/[[Primacy]]/Sovereign] from using the gifts it granted for subjugation. Are we to accept that these, too, were meant to happen? If you reject the notion that destruction can be a final shape, how are we to accept that the Gardener allowed us to make such grievous mistakes?


[RS6243199]
[RS6243199]