3,890
edits
Forum:Image category additions: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Shazamikaze (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Forumheader|Community Proposal}} <!-- Please don't remove anything above this line, and put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ -...") |
Shazamikaze (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Just had a thought about all these images that keep getting added to the wiki. They are still unused, and yet they still are very much needed for visual context. I have already started creating image categories based on weapon archetype, e.g., Auto rifle, Sniper rifle, Machine gun, and so forth. These are being created to better manage where the desired image can be found instead of constantly scrolling and searching. But as there are so many, perhaps additional help is required in tagging images appropriately. Also, was wondering if perhaps to further facilitate the management of images by weapon archetype is by grouping them under a single category as per weapon class such as by Primary, Special, and Heavy. Personally, I think this may help, but not entirely convinced this could actually help. Further input and discussion would greatly benefit this. So, any thoughts? How about some support too? --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]) 12:03, 4 February 2016 (EST)Xamikaze330 | Just had a thought about all these images that keep getting added to the wiki. They are still unused, and yet they still are very much needed for visual context. I have already started creating image categories based on weapon archetype, e.g., Auto rifle, Sniper rifle, Machine gun, and so forth. These are being created to better manage where the desired image can be found instead of constantly scrolling and searching. But as there are so many, perhaps additional help is required in tagging images appropriately. Also, was wondering if perhaps to further facilitate the management of images by weapon archetype is by grouping them under a single category as per weapon class such as by Primary, Special, and Heavy. Personally, I think this may help, but not entirely convinced this could actually help. Further input and discussion would greatly benefit this. So, any thoughts? How about some support too? --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]) 12:03, 4 February 2016 (EST)Xamikaze330 | ||
:I agree, this really needs to be done. I will gladly try to help out with this.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 12:09, 4 February 2016 (EST) | |||
::Thanks for the support! But should they be grouped according to class as well as archetype? --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]) 12:14, 4 February 2016 (EST)Xamikaze330 | |||