Talk:Spider Tank: Difference between revisions

Talk:Spider Tank (edit)

Revision as of 11:51, February 24, 2013

660 bytes added , 11 years ago

and for further clarity, unless Bungie confirms their existence.

Hacame

6

edits

Revision as of 08:44, February 24, 2013 (edit) TentacleTornado (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:51, February 24, 2013 (edit) (undo) Hacame (talk \| contribs) (and for further clarity, unless Bungie confirms their existence.) Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:About that sourcing the name from IGN's "Concept Art Analysis", it appears "Spider Tank" is the working title for the vehicle, whether or not it will be in the game. IGN is not Bungie, this is true. But IGN appears to be the main source of ''Destiny'' information out there, looking at the amount of information Bungie has released. Though by that logic, ''all'' citations from sources outside Bungie should be removed, which isn't plausible. Anyway, this is the reason I added the "References" template, as much information in the article is either uncited or is cited from an unreliable source. Should I add the "[[Template:Conjectural title\|Conjectural title]]" template, or perhaps transfer the "[[halopedia:Template:Tentative\|Tentative]]" template? --<b>[[User:TentacleTornado\|<font color="#2E8B57">''Tent''</font><font color="#3CB371">''acle''</font>]][[User talk:TentacleTornado\|<font color="#DAA520">''Torn''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/TentacleTornado\|<font color="#B8860B">''ado''</font>]]</b> 07:44, 24 February 2013 (EST)		:About that sourcing the name from IGN's "Concept Art Analysis", it appears "Spider Tank" is the working title for the vehicle, whether or not it will be in the game. IGN is not Bungie, this is true. But IGN appears to be the main source of ''Destiny'' information out there, looking at the amount of information Bungie has released. Though by that logic, ''all'' citations from sources outside Bungie should be removed, which isn't plausible. Anyway, this is the reason I added the "References" template, as much information in the article is either uncited or is cited from an unreliable source. Should I add the "[[Template:Conjectural title\|Conjectural title]]" template, or perhaps transfer the "[[halopedia:Template:Tentative\|Tentative]]" template? --<b>[[User:TentacleTornado\|<font color="#2E8B57">''Tent''</font><font color="#3CB371">''acle''</font>]][[User talk:TentacleTornado\|<font color="#DAA520">''Torn''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/TentacleTornado\|<font color="#B8860B">''ado''</font>]]</b> 07:44, 24 February 2013 (EST)

			::The References template is used to indicate uncited information. For disputed info, we should be using FOF template. Halopedia has one if I'm not mistaken. Also, you misread the comment (though that might be my fault for not relaying the message clearly). Articles by these so-called "professional game journalists" is all fine and dandy but I think we should avoid using nicknames given by the press as it is wrong. I think we saw enough issues back during the whole "Storm Covenant"/"Covenant Storm" debacle. <b>[[Userprofile:Hacame\|<span style="color:#483C32; font-family:Comic Sans MS; font-size:14px;">Hacame</span>]]</b> 10:51, 24 February 2013 (EST)